PLURIBUSUNUM.NET ROUND TABLE

Welcome to the PluribusUnum Round Table

If you cannot be constructive and contribute in an intelligent way then please do not post here. Everyone has an opinion and we respect yours so we ask that you respect the opinions of others as well. You are welcome to post your opinion on any subject concerning current affairs but please keep it clean and please do not attack others. You may disagree with others just please do not be malicious in your postings and responses.


Search For Similar Forums   ·   Return to Website

  First
  Prev
  Reply
  Forum
Next  
Last  
Search this Forum:  
Viewing Page 1 of 1 (Total Posts: 3)


Author Comment    
Ashley

spongemom1019@yahoo.com www.spongemom.com/forum

IP: 69.151.28.113

Apr 29, 06 - 5:13 PM
Flight 93

The movie opened in theaters yesterday. It's also playing right now on A&E.

This movie depicts so-called "real" events of the happenings on that flight, with passengers overtaking hijackers and those infamous cell phone calls.

However, evidence points to Flight 93 having landed in Cleveland, and its passengers unloaded into a secure base at NASA.

There is also evidence that those cell phone calls could not possibly have been made at the altitude at which the plane was flying. Independent experiments show less than a 1 in 100 chance of a successful cell phone call being made at 8,000 feet, let alone 32,000 feet, the typical cruising altitude of a flight such as Flight 93.

There is also the issue of the crash site. There were no plane parts, no bodies, not really anything that would indicate that a plane had ever crashed there. The coroner at the scene is quoted as saying "I stopped being coroner after about 10 minutes. There were no bodies there." Another quote: "It looked like someone dug a hole and dumped a truckload of trash into it."

The official government story would have us believe that the plane and the passengers were incinerated upon impact, something that is physically impossible at the temperatures at which jet fuel (a.k.a. kerosene) burns, and also something that has never happened before in the history of airplane crashes.

What's your take?
The GYPSY

www.pluribusunum.net

IP: 69.92.156.86

May 1st, 2006 - 5:22 AM
Re: Flight 93

This is honestly one conspiracy theory that I have not considered nor really heard anything about at this point so I really can't, with any amount of authority, make a comment on it. After I have more information and I have studied and formed my own opinions I may have a relevant and informed comment. Let's just leave it at this for now.... I ceased being amazed at the lengths our government will work to perpitrate a coverup the day I formed my personal opinion on the assasination of JFK.
Ashley

www.spongemom.com/forum

IP: 69.148.145.105

May 1st, 2006 - 4:23 PM
Re: Flight 93

Just one more thing: It's not a theory if you can prove it. ;)

If you've got the time, check out www.loosechange911.com for loads of evidence regarding Flight 93 as well as the twin towers, WTC7, and the Pentagon.


  First
  Prev
  Reply
  Forum
Next  
Last  




Get your FREE forum service! 
Traffic Exchange · E-Cards · Mini Polls · Affiliate Programs  powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com